Beginning to blog

Author: ABCblog (Page 2 of 2)

Screencastify for the Win(dirstat)

It was hard to get excited about Screencastify after already interrogating Techsmith Capture and integrating it into my tech usage, and I never really did get excited. After trying to compare the two for long enough and looking into their respective companies, I came to the conclusion that I won’t use either.

While these two programs are sleek and user-friendly, OBS (Open Broadcast Studio) offers even more tools and in depth editing options while being a free and open source software. Obviously the flaw with this is that user-friendly options will provide higher consistency and accessibility for teachers everywhere, but as someone who is eager to explore the intricacies of the software I use, OBS is the clear choice.

This is not to say that Screencastify is a bad program, it is quick, convenient, and does what it says on the box; however, I see any opportunity for public entities to avoid reliance on private companies as a win, especially when those funds can go to either other programs or supporting the open source software. Using open source software such as OBS or Mattermost can also be used as a talking point in the classroom around community and the possibilities of collaboration.

Below is a screencastify recording of me showing of ANOTHER one of my favorite open source programs, WinDirStat.

Hypothesis: Highlight or low-light of the week?

Since I was one of the first to annotate the article, I found the highlights and annotations to be sleek and welcoming additions to the piece; however, I can easily imagine that by the time our entire class has gone through the article, that it would less pleasant, and potentially overwhelming to sparse all the overlapping annotations and long threads of replies. Once many annotations are already in place, it my also disincentivize further contributions from the folks who join later on, as they don’t want to further clutter up the page.

Where I can see this tool being extremely useful is in smaller groups.  If 4-5 colleagues need to analyze a few articles or resources, Hypothesis could be invaluable in sharing thoughts and ideas asynchronously. It could even be good for dividing the readings and having each person annotate and summarize their respective sections and the others could read their summaries while skimming the article at large.

Hypothesis could also fill a niche, as I am sure it will in our course, of teachers providing assessment to online submissions such as blog posts or website creation. I can imagine a computers teacher loving this program as it would provide them with a quick and convenient method of delivering feedback, and provide the recipient with clear highlighting and direction as opposed to general feedback at the bottom of the page. This also entails that a class that explicitly does not use online resources will find no use for this program.

Something the article being annotated above puts forward is that technology does not implicitly help our pedagogy and learning outcomes. For Hypotheses I would agree. As mentioned above, factors such as class size and course content narrow the scope of Hypothesis tremendously; however, under the correct circumstances (and with enough enthusiasm from all group members) Hypotheses promises to be a very rewarding tool. I am excited to use it within our class, and maybe in some of our programs group assignments, to be able to fully evaluate the software and decide whether or not I will incorporate it into my own pedagogy and classroom in the future.

The Timer and a Check Check Check in


The first half of this blog is a rant; a rant directed at this thing…

More specifically, when this thing ends up like this…

The timer is a necessary evil, one that I have appreciated when my opponent is stalling out a lost game on purpose, but one I detest when backed into a corner. I would estimate 15-20% of my lost games are not due to my opponent, but due to this ticking nuisance ticking me off. This may also be a symptom of being newer to the game, as it takes quite a lot of focus and attention for extended periods of time to figure out my next move, but even spectating masters you see the timer show its force.

In terms of game length, there are multiple options and categories available for play.

“In chess, the categories of short time limits are: “bullet“, “blitz“, and “rapid“. “Bullet” games are the fastest, with either a very short time limit per move (such as ten seconds) or a very short total time (such as one or two minutes). “Blitz” games typically give five to ten minutes per player, and “rapid” games give between ten and sixty minutes”.

The game mode I have preferred is ten minute “rapid” which seems to be the standard in online chess communities. I enjoy rapid the most as it seems like almost enough time for me to fully think out my moves, which forces me to learn patterns and commit to lines I otherwise might not commit to if I had more time. Although blitz (5 minutes) and bullet (1 minute) have also challenged me in different ways, I often find I learn less from those games as I end up guessing a LOT. Maybe the next Check Check Check in will feature a different time category! Speaking of…


For this week’s blog I thought we would also do our first “Check Check Check in” which will be accompanying videos where I narrate my thought process while playing the game. The hope of this series of videos will be to see my knowledge and thought process expand over the course of this inquiry into chess. At least that is the hope!


Thanks for reading/watching, keep your piece of mind and your mind for pieces!

Best, jordan

TechSmith Screen Captured my Heart

Seconds turn into minutes turn into hours turn into days turn into weeks turn into months turn into years turn into decades turn into lifetimes…

It would be impossible to calculate how much of my life has withered away hitting “print screen,” pasting my image into paint, cropping it, and finally copying it. If only there was a tool available to me, a lowly Windows 7 user with no built-in capture device, well it turns out there is!

TechSmith Capture answers prayers I never knew I could make, and the god of I.T. now shines down on me.

To celebrate this newfound boon, I will be providing a screen recording (ironically from OBS as I want to show you TechSmith Capture and it cannot capture itself) of me putting the program to good use!

 

All aBoard the Chess Express

While I do already understand the fundamentals of chess, I thought it would be appropriate to start this blog at the very beginning, the board and the pieces.

The board of chess could likely be described by anyone, even those who have never played. It’s ubiquitous in it’s simplicity: Alternating (typically white and black) tiles creating a checkered pattern. It’s on this playing field that our pieces begin their journeys, but not all of their journeys are equal. Some are strong and decisive, charging head on into the enemy. Some are more calculated, attacking at unexpected angles. Some avoid straight paths altogether, favoring a more surprising advance. Some are some combination of the rest, but some, some are simple, and none are more simple than the humble pawn.

The Pawn

Pawn Movement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eight strong at the start of the game, the pawn’s confidence is unrivaled. While typically the pawn is limited to moving one space at a time, it’s first move can be up to two spaces forward. The interesting thing that sets pawn’s apart from the other pieces, is that the pawn’s movements and attacks are separate. For every other piece, their movement and attack’s are synonymous, but for the pawn, they may only move forward UNLESS they are attacking, in which case they take a piece at a diagonal.

Pawn Attack

The Rook

Rook Movement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ditching some of the complexity of the pawn in favor of brute force, we find ourselves observing the rook. Considered the second-most powerful piece, the rook can move horizontally or vertically and attack at any distance. This makes the rook not only a constant threat as its presence is sure to be known, but also a consistent defender as it can protect an entire row on its own.

 

The Knight

Knight Movement

@zury14benitez

This agile horse has been the most confusing and surprising piece for me to both use and encounter, and I can only assume that many new players will have the same experience. Typically it is most commonly described as moving in an “L” shape pattern.  In first imagining it’s capabilities, that seems rather simple, but as you can see by the picture above, depending on the knight’s positioning it can have up to eight potential moves! Notably, the knight can also “go over” other pieces and attack positions your opponent may have felt were defended.

 

The Bishop

Bishop Movement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The bishop is the rook if you rotated its movements 45 degrees. Moving only at a diagonal, but again infinite in it’s potential distance for an attack. While slightly less revered than the rook as it can be dealt with far easier, it opens up potential sneaky attacks the the rook’s bumbling nature could never attempt.

The Queen & the King

@randyfath

King Movement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finally we find our way to the Queen and the King. While the King is technically the most important piece in the game, as it is the sole factor deciding whether the game is won or lost, I put the queen first as it is far more powerful and can often decide the game itself. The other reason for grouping them together is that they share the same directional movement, that being ANY direction; however, the king may only move one tile, whereas the queen (essentially a combination of the rook and bishop) can move infinitely in any direction. Typically if the queen is lost (without a substantial trade such as the opponents queen) it will not be long before the king follows.

Queen Movement

Conclusion

So we know how the pieces move! Yay!

While each piece deserves hundreds of it’s own blog posts, this is certainly the first step, yet knowing how to throw a football and where to throw it are substantially different things. Now that we know the how, over the coming weeks I hope to get into the where and why of piece movement.

While these are all the fundamental movements of chess, look forward to learning a couple more movement options that are lesser known in the coming weeks: Castling, and en passant.

Keep your Piece of Mind and your Mind for Pieces and I will see you next week!

WordPress – New Beginnings

I have never read a blog that did not have a recipe at the bottom that I quickly scrolled to, bypassing the cookbook advertisements the author was so intent on me seeing.

I am excited. WordPress seems intuitive, the course content for EDCI 336 seems engaging, and maybe by starting a blog I will finally fill that everlasting need for attention, even if its just by the one or two folks who will offer it. If a third shows up I will classify my blog as viral, despite any naysayers who might challenge that label. One can only assume that only one has viewed their blog and they’re jealous of my fame.

I have chosen chess as the focus for my free inquiry, as I have just started learning to play, which is evident by how often I lose, but starting out at the bottom only means I will have tons of “material” to build up with. That was a chess pun, if you didn’t get it then I can wholeheartedly recommend this cool new blog all the kids are talking about that just (abcblog.)opened(.ca) up. I also just enjoy that “A Beginner’s Chess blog” can be shortened to ABCblog which is fitting as a teacher in training.

Me (HenryHolmvik) losing at chess circa September 15th 2020 (Colorized).

Jokes aside I am finding how fluid both creating and absorbing information in a blog format can be effective in learning. I cannot fathom the amount of time spent referring to the back of textbook to find a source, to then attempt to find said source online, or even in print! In this format I can easily implement links to sources while maintaining the a bite-sized approachability that might be lacking in other online academic sources. For example, chess has two players. While some people are skeptical I do believe Wikipedia on that one.

 

Excited to learn with all of you!

Newer posts »

© 2024 Holmework

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑